Wikinews writing an article

I have been a member of both main U. So Wikipedia always does a very strict inverted pyramid, right? This should be made wikinews writing an article to all participants that this applies to.

Use the Reference desk to find images to upload, or take your own photos too see digital cameraor even draw your own pictures using a free program like the Gimpfor example.

Quantity is incredibly important for Wikinews' perception in the outside world. I mean, there are tons of similarities to how it would look on the wire and how it might look on [Wikipedia]. Use this link to go directly to the upload page. If some judges are not available on a given day, the rest should decide the issue, IMO.

Cyper was referring to my request for help I posted to his talk page, machine translated into German. The alternative is to list "article debt" and "jokers" separately, but that seemed more complex to me.

If the writer doesn;t do this, the work will pass on to editors to add it later. Wikinews has related news: We also might consider putting a limit on the number of contestants that can contribute towards one article for contest purposes.

I'm not sure quite what to say because a contestant can rejoin under a new name under any circumstances I've seen a fair share of articles written about an event that occured a few days before.

Wikipedia:Your first article

See the collaboration page for more details. Please note that in order to make sure that the contest actually ends, the judges may, in a majority decision, modify the rules for the handing out of jokers during the contest.

If a participant joined on day one and hasn't contributed any articles, they should be given until the end of the day September 4th Ideally, we can together displace one of the two major parties; such is the near-majority level of disapproval of the antiquated mainstream parties and the desire for a true alternative.

File:Writing a Wikinews article - Doctor Who.ogv

In the final phase of the last contest, I experimented with scoring; this only led to friction -- if you have simple standards, the risks of conflicts over rules and interpretations are decreased. My recommendation is that existing IWWC judges try to verify that participants from other languages are contributing articles of sufficient length and frequency as quality can't be determined Add them using this syntax: If the article is written within a few few minutes or hours of it happening, it's breaking news, rock on.

But something brings people there instead of to Wikinews. So yes, [in my opinion] you absolutely have proved Robert McHenry wrong.

As for topic-collisions, in cases where people have paid attention to the list of stories in development, we have generally been generous in the last contest. Good work on adding the date template. If they'd like to be given another chance because they didn't fully understand the rules or they thought they were unfairly disqualified Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi.

I'll ensure that gets clarified on the main rules page. So less…what is it that makes people makes people prefer to contribute to Wikipedia? It also makes it less likely that there might be a sort of language-favoritism, where judges rate the submissions in their own language higher.

I would suggest that there should be some effect based on the quality level of the article as determined by the judges to counter this tendency. Don't hundreds of millions of people speak Spanish?

In I helped organize a press conference for then-presidential candidate Ralph Naderafter having helped support efforts to draft him as a candidate. What now, do we let every dropped contestant do the same?

It is not important that we have a new president bearing the face of change. Not so much on Wikinewsthe collaborative-journalism project that has faltered since launching in December One of the main reasons why is because the task of writing a news story with a lead, a coherent narrative, and a deadline is very different than writing an encyclopedia article.

Try to use HotCat, and it will give you suggestions to which categories to add. Maybe you know this one, it's the same as Wikipedia's:) You may consider to put {} at the top, while writing your article.

You must add at least 2 sources for the article. Once you are done, add {}. English: A walk through of creating an article on English Wikinews with a Doctor Who related news story as an example.

Wikinews is a free-content news source wiki and a project of the Wikimedia fmgm2018.com site works through collaborative fmgm2018.comdia co-founder Jimmy Wales has distinguished Wikinews from Wikipedia by saying "on Wikinews, each story is to be written as a news story as opposed to an encyclopedia article." The neutral point of view policy espoused in Wikinews distinguishes it from.

Wikinews articles should not infringe on the copyright of any other work. So copying portions of text from other sources into a Wikinews article is usually not acceptable, and in some cases, even rewriting the content of another source is not sufficient.

This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike Unported license.: You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work; to remix – to adapt the work; Under the following conditions: attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of.

Download
Wikinews writing an article
Rated 4/5 based on 71 review